Optris brand for affordable infrared cameras and pyrometers
tune

Product Configurator

Finding the perfect Optris product for your needs.

IR Thermometer Configurator arrow_forward IR Camera Configurator arrow_forward
Configurator Screen
lens_blur

Optics Calculator

Use the Calculator to quickly determine the right spot size for your needs.

Explore Now arrow_forward
Calculator Screen
forum

Chat with Engineers

Online service support

Opening Hours
Monday – Thursday: 08:00 – 17:00
Friday: 08:00 – 16:00

Chat Now arrow_forward
call

Call Us

Sales department:
+49 30 500 197-0

Opening Hours
Monday – Thursday: 08:00 – 17:00
Friday: 08:00 – 16:00

 

mail

Email Us

Sales department:
[email protected]

Contact Us arrow_forward
construction

Request a Repair

Service request for repair orders:
[email protected]

Service Request Form arrow_forward

Infrared Window Materials

Understanding which Infrared Window works

Infrared windows are wavelength-dependent, meaning their materials limit the usable spectral range. Temperature measurements must be taken through a viewing window in some cases, such as closed reaction chambers, ovens, or vacuum systems.

These specialized windows serve as transparent interfaces, enabling thermal imaging cameras and infrared thermometers to capture accurate readings without direct access to the target surface. By selecting the correct material and design, engineers and researchers can ensure reliable data collection while maintaining the structural and safety integrity of the enclosed environment.

The transmissivity of this window must align with the sensor’s spectral sensitivity. Quartz glass is often suitable for high-temperature applications due to its thermal stability. In contrast, for lower-temperature measurements within the 8–14 μm wavelength range—common in long-wave infrared thermography—materials such as germanium, AMTIR, or zinc selenide are preferred. Each material exhibits distinct transmission properties. Anti-reflective coatings can significantly enhance transmission efficiency, achieving up to 95% transmissivity in some cases. However, any transmission loss must be compensated for during calibration. If the manufacturer provides precise transmissivity data for the relevant wavelength range, this can be applied directly in the measurement setup. Otherwise, empirical determination may be required using a reference source and an infrared thermometer. The software can correct this if the manufacturer specifies the exact transmissivity for the given wavelength. Optically transparent materials that transmit both visible and infrared light are advantageous in applications where visual alignment is necessary, such as positioning a sensor inside a vacuum chamber. Figure 1 illustrates the transmittance of some popular window materials at 3mm thickness.

Figure 1: Transmittance of some popular window materials. Results are simulated for window thickness of 3mm without any coating.
Figure 1: Transmittance of some popular window materials. Results are simulated for window thickness of 3mm without any coating.

When selecting a window for infrared temperature measurement, several factors besides wavelength compatibility and transmissivity should be considered.

Another important consideration is the window’s mechanical strength, particularly in environments where it may be exposed to pressure differentials, vibration, high temperatures, or physical impact. The window’s thickness must be adequate to withstand these stresses without distorting or breaking. The following equation can calculate the window thickness [math]\ t[/math] to withstand pressure differential  at opposite sides for circular windows with an unsupported radius  and a rectangular window with length [math]l[/math] and width [math]w[/math] at a given modulus rupture of the material [math]MOR[/math]. Here, the factor [math]K\ [/math] corresponds to the mounting option and is equal = 0.75 if mounted with clamped edges and unclamped edges correspond to [math]K=1.125[/math]. Additionally, engineers add a safety factor [math]SF[/math] Safety factor between 4…6.

Circular windows:

[math]t=r\ \sqrt(P\ \cdot\ K\ \cdot\ SF/MOR)[/math]

Rectangular windows:

[math]t=l\cdot\ w\sqrt{P\ \cdot\ K\ \cdot\frac{SF}{2\cdot M\ O\ R\ \left(l^2+w^2\right)}}[/math]

Engineers must balance the window’s mechanical strength with its optical transmittance. Thicker windows provide greater robustness but reduce transmittance due to increased optical absorption. Conversely, thinner windows enhance light transmission but may lack long-term durability. From a measurement perspective, maximizing transmittance is critical to ensure high signal quality, while mechanical considerations demand sufficient strength to withstand operational demands over the equipment’s lifetime. Figure 2 shows the transmittance of a material for different thicknesses. The decrease of transmittance is depending on wavelength as well as thickness.

Figure 2: Exemplary transmittance for different thicknesses for Germanium without coating.
Figure 2: Exemplary transmittance for different thicknesses for Germanium without coating.

Another essential characteristic to consider when selecting an optical window for thermal or infrared applications is its maximum operating temperature. This parameter defines the highest temperature at which the material can reliably function without undergoing physical or chemical degradation. If the temperature in the application environment exceeds this threshold, the window may lose its transparency (becoming opaque), deform due to softening, or even crack and shatter as it becomes brittle. Such failures compromise the accuracy and reliability of temperature measurements and can damage the sensor or camera behind the window and pose safety risks in industrial settings. Therefore, choosing a window material with an adequate thermal tolerance is critical for long-term performance and system integrity.

Beyond material properties, the mechanical and environmental durability of the IR window must be considered. Impact resistance, dust and moisture protection, and mounting configurations (flange, screw-in, or hinged designs) all influence performance in real-world conditions.

Thermal expansion and resistance to thermal shock are also relevant, especially in high-temperature or rapidly changing thermal environments. A material that expands or contracts significantly with temperature changes can introduce stress fractures or misalign the optical path, potentially degrading measurement quality or damaging the sensor system. Surface quality and flatness are crucial for minimizing optical distortions and ensuring a consistent infrared transmission. Poor surface quality can scatter or reflect radiation in unintended ways, reducing the effective signal reaching the detector. In high-precision systems, even slight imperfections in surface polish or flatness can impact the accuracy of the measurement. Environmental durability is another key factor. The window material must resist environmental influences such as dust, moisture, and chemical exposure. In harsh or corrosive environments, certain materials may degrade over time or lose their optical properties, leading to inaccurate readings or failure. Proper sealing around the window is equally important to prevent contaminants from entering the optical path or the protected space behind the window.

The following table summarizes typical values of IR window materials.

Material IR Wavelength [μm] Typical Transmission at 3 mm thickness [%] Maximal Operating Temperature [°C] Transmission in visible Spectrum Chemical Resistance UHV Suitable Non-toxic
Generally Safe Materials
Notes Price Material Properties  
Young’s Modulus [Gpa] Density [g/cm³] Poisson’s Ratio CTE [10⁻⁶/°C] MOR
[Mpa]
 
Amorphous 0.7 – 13 70 300 No Moderate Yes Low toxicity (contains Ge compounds; fragile) Chalcogenide glass, brittle, broadband IR glass High cost, specialty material 25 4,4 0,28 20,0 30–50  
Al₂O₃ 1 – 4 85 1800 Yes Very good Yes Non-toxic Single crystal, high hardness Very high cost, precision IR optics 400 3,98 0,25 5,0 300–700  
BaF₂ 2 – 5.1 90 500 Yes Few Yes Potentially toxic (barium ions; harmful if ingested or inhaled) Relatively soft, cleavable, Wide transmission range High cost, specialty material 53 4,89 0,34 18,1 30–50  
CaCO₃ 0.2 – 3.2 75 600 Yes Moderate Yes Non-toxic Very brittle, cleaves easily, birefringent, polarization optics High cost, specialty material 70 2,71 0,16 25,0 10–30  
CaF₂ 2 – 8 92 600 Yes Few Yes Non-toxic moderate strength, sensitive to thermal shock, low refractive index Moderate cost 75 3,18 0,26 18,85 40–70  
CsI 0.25 – 55 85 350 Yes Poor Yes Moderate hazard (cesium and iodide compounds can be toxic in soluble form) Very soft, hygroscopic, Very broad transmission High cost, specialty material 12 4,51 0,28 55,0 10–20  
Ge 2 – 16 50 100 No Good Yes Non-toxic Brittle, depends on crystal orientation, high refractive index Very high cost, precision IR optics 102 5,32 0,28 6,1 70–120  
TlBrI 1 – 14 90 75 Yes Good Yes Toxic (contains thallium, which is highly toxic and regulated) Soft, low mechanical strength, wideband IR Extremely high, restricted 15 7,37 0,41 37,4 15–30  
LiF 0.15 – 6 91 600 Yes Poor Yes Slightly toxic (ingestion or dust inhalation) Cleavable, sensitive to thermal shock, UV to IR Moderate cost 64 2,64 0,25 37,0 40–80  
MgF₂ 0.12 – 6 94 1000 Yes Excellent Yes Non-toxic Durable, harsh environments, moderate strength, used in coatings Moderate cost 138 3,18 0,27 13,7 80–120  
NaCl 0.25 – 16 92 800 Yes Poor Yes Non-toxic Very soft, hygroscopic, wide transmission range Low cost 30 2,17 0,25 45,0 10–20  
Si 1.5 – 8 52 200 No Very good Yes Non-toxic Brittle but stronger than Ge, lightweight Moderate cost 130 2,33 0,28 2,6 100–200  
SiO₂ 1 – 2.5 93 900 Yes Very good Yes Non-toxic (inhalation of dust is harmful) Amorphous, good thermal shock resistance, low thermal expansion Low cost, widely available 73 2,2 0,17 0,55 50–100  
ZnS 2 – 14 75 250 Yes Good Yes Low toxicity (avoid inhalation of dust) Multispectral grade stronger than standard, high refractive index High cost, specialty material 74 4,09 0,28 7,85 70–100  
ZnSe 2 – 14 70 250 Yes Good Yes Potentially toxic (selenium compounds; avoid dust or vapor exposure) Softer than ZnS, IR-transmissive, low absorption Very high cost, precision IR optics 70 5,27 0,28 7,1 50–80  

Summary

  • Infrared windows must match the sensor’s spectral sensitivity
  • Thicker windows withstand pressure/vibration but reduce transmittance; thinner ones optimize signal quality but risk durability.
  • Maximum operating temperature limits prevent degradation (e.g., cracking, opacity).
  • Thermal expansion mismatch with mounting hardware can induce stress; low-CTE materials (e.g., fused silica) are preferred for high ΔT environments.
  • Surface quality (λ/4 flatness, <60-40 scratch-dig) minimizes wavefront distortion and scatter.
  • Chemical/abrasion resistance: Coatings (e.g., diamond-like carbon on Ge) protect against corrosive or particulate-laden environments.
  • Transmissivity correction: Requires either:
    • Manufacturer-provided spectral transmission data (input into sensor software).
    • Empirical calibration using a blackbody reference and a known IR thermometer

     

Sources

  1. Hecht, Eugene. Optik, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2018.  DOI: 10.1515/9783110526653
  2. T. Holliday and J. A. Kay, Understanding infrared windows and their effects on infrared readings, Conference Record of 2013 Annual IEEE Pulp and Paper Industry Technical Conference (PPIC), Charlotte, NC, USA, 2013, pp. 26-33, DOI: 10.1109/PPIC.2013.6656039

COMPARE:

Compare